The second leg will take place at Ülker Stadyumu in Istanbul, where Fenerbahce are traditionally very strong.
Their home strength could be decisive in making up the deficit from the first leg.

With an experienced coach like José Mourinho on the sidelines, Fenerbahce have the tactical depth and ability to adapt in crucial games.
Mourinho is known for getting the best out of his teams in such situations.

Lille will be without a number of key players, including Ismaily and Samuel Umtiti.
These absences could weaken Lille’s defense and give Fenerbahce more space to dominate the game.

Fenerbahce have been strong offensively in recent games, with players like Dušan Tadić and Edin Džeko having the potential to score crucial goals.
Offensive penetration could be the key to turning the game around.

• Giron’s strong form on hard court: Marcos Giron has achieved good results on hard court this season.
  His solid performance at tournaments such as the Hall of Fame Open, where he reached the final, shows his strength on fast surfaces.
• Baez’s weaknesses on hard courts: Sebastian Baez is less successful on hard courts.
  He has achieved his best results on clay and his form on hard court this season is not as strong as Giron’s.
• Direct record: Although Baez defeated Giron in their last meeting on clay, the dynamic is different on hard court.
  Giron has shown in the past that he copes better on this surface.
• Giron’s recent successes: Giron recently defeated Nuno Borges in two sets, which shows that he is in good form.
  These recent successes give him extra confidence for the match against Baez.

• Lehečka’s form on hard courts: Jiří Lehečka has shown strong performances on hard courts this season, including deep runs at tournaments such as the Australian Open, where he reached the quarterfinals.
  His style of play comes into its own on this surface, which gives him a clear advantage over Navone.
• Experience and ranking position: Lehečka is clearly the more experienced player on the ATP Tour and is well ahead of Navone in the world rankings.
  These ranking advantages also reflect Lehečka’s higher level and consistency compared to Navone, who mainly plays at Challenger level.
• Navone’s limited experience on hard courts: Mariano Navone has little experience and success on hard courts, which puts him at a distinct disadvantage in a match against an established player like Lehečka.
  This lack of experience on fast surfaces could translate into a clear win for Lehečka.
• Head-to-head comparison: While the two players have yet to face each other, Lehečka’s overall tour experience and ability to perform on a variety of surfaces speaks clearly in his favor, especially considering the game handicap.

• Strong home record for Bodo/Glimt: Bodo/Glimt is known for its impressive home record.
  They have won four of their last five home games, which underlines their home strength.
  The Norwegian team has shown this season that they are particularly difficult to beat at home.
• Victory in the first leg: Bodo/Glimt won the first leg in Poland 1:0, which gives them a psychological advantage.
  They have shown that they are also capable of winning important games away from home and can now go into the second leg with a tailwind.
• Defensive stability: The team has only conceded one goal in the last five games.
  This defensive stability could be a decisive factor in keeping Jagiellonia at bay and controlling the game.
• Offensive punch: Bodo/Glimt have scored a total of eight goals in their last five games, which indicates a strong offense.
  Their ability to score regularly gives them a clear advantage.
• Jagiellonia’s weakness away from home: Jagiellonia have shown difficulties away from home, especially against stronger opponents.
  They have not always been convincing away from home in their last few games, which plays into Bodo/Glimt’s hands.

• Home strength of APOEL: APOEL have shown a strong home record in the past, especially in European competitions.
  Although they lost the first leg 2-0, they could have the confidence and the support of the fans at their home stadium, the Neo GSP, to turn the game around.
• Defensive stability of Slovan: While Slovan Bratislava did not allow any clear-cut chances in the first leg, the offensive urgency of APOEL could put more pressure on the Slovakian defense in the second leg.
  APOEL will certainly push for an early goal to tilt the game in their favor.
• Historic results: APOEL have shown in previous encounters that they are capable of holding their own against Slovan Bratislava.
  In 2011, they beat Slovan 2-0 in a similar scenario, which helped them progress at the time.
• Tactical adjustments: APOEL have made a lot of personnel changes over the summer and will go into this crucial game with a fresh approach and perhaps new tactical adjustments.
  The team will be highly motivated to make up the deficit and reach the next round.